Time to Buy Gold Mining Stocks?
Patience remains gold-mining investment's key virtue...
GOLD MINING stocks are among the most hated equities in the stock market,
but that will change as the
macro shifts in their favor for the first time since 2001-2003, writes Gary Tanashian in his Notes
from the Rabbit Hole.
It is the nature of the masses, the majority, the consensus...the HERD...to follow the
trend.
It
is a lot easier to swim downstream than to fight the current. Just go with the flow. And from a
US-centric view the flow has, with a
blessed interruption from 2001 to 2003, been inflationary monetary policy free flowing into asset
markets as needed and on demand at
every point of financial crisis since. Armageddon '08 and the Covid crash were two primary
examples.
With the
30-year Treasury bond yield 'Continuum' lower squarely showing a disinflationary trend for decades, full
license was given to our
policy heroes to act, mopping up each crisis with an unrelenting fire hose of 'Whatever it takes!'
monetary policy.
Throw in a side order of government (democrat or republican) always willing to spend and
stimulate its favored areas
(often very different areas per the party in power, but favored areas nonetheless) and you've got an
ongoing bubble in monetary and
fiscal policy. You also got a toxic environment for the wretched companies that dig the monetary metal
(which is well outside the
'debt for growth' system) out of the ground.
This chart tells a story of
something that was in place for
decades (going back to the 1980s, not shown on this chart) that is no longer in place.

30 year Treasury
yield
continuum, which implies a new macro and a new era for gold stocks
In my
opinion, markets operating as if all
is as it has been (hello US headline indexes, bad breadth and all) are dead men walking.
The Continuum is a
pictorial view of the funding mechanism of the bubble. Well, the mechanism is severely altered, if not
broken.
I began this post with the intention to keep it very simple and have already veered from
that course. So let's get it
back on course. Let's take a look at gold mining stocks through the prism of their relationship to gold
and gold's relationship to
other markets.
This daily chart shows that in 2023 gold stocks (HUI) had
rightly traveled both positively and
negatively in line with their best fundamental gauges. Those are gold's relationships with commodities
and inflation.

When
gold declined in relation to inflation signalers like 'inflation expectations' gauge RINF and commodity
index GNX, gold stocks
declined right along with them. As it became apparent that inflation was weakening and gold rose vs.
those items, gold stocks
rallied.
Then came the disconnect and positive divergence (for gold stocks) by
gold's relationship to the
inflation signalers (RINF, GNX, etc). I believe this happened because the herd finally bought the
disinflationary 'Goldilocks' (soft
landing or even NO landing) story as euphoria set in and Tech/Growth stocks gained momentum.
The hard decline
by HUI from Q4 2023 to Q1 2024 aped the decline in gold vs. the stock market (SPX). Of course, the
HUI/Gold ratio tagged right
along.
"Gold stocks suck!" demands the herd. And the herd is right; for
now.
The
NFTRH view has for over a year been for disinflationary Goldilocks to be followed by an uncomfortable
decline in inflation. In other
words, a deflation scare, quite possibly as a precursor to the next terrible inflation phase out in 2025
or thereafter.
With indexes like SPX, NDX and SOX still orbiting in blue sky the Gold/SPX ratio is in the
tank and right along with it
have been gold stocks (and their ratio to gold). While Gold/GNX and Gold/RINF have represented a
positive divergence for gold stocks,
Gold/SPX has been quite the opposite. Hence, we await the end of the currently at high risk bull market
in stocks.
Here is the same chart, expanded to a long-term view showing the 2001-2003 period when
Gold/SPX rose, Gold/GNX rose and
by extension, HUI/Gold and nominal HUI rose. There was no such thing as an 'inflation expectations' ETF
back then, but using TIP/TLT
or TIP/IEF, you'd get the same result; gold rising in relation to those ratios.
After 2003, gold mining
stocks entered a bubble as they blasted off to the stratosphere despite a negative macro as gold
under-performed commodities and flat
lined vs. stocks during that inflationary time.

I usually disregard political rancor in my analysis,
but this year I have been hit over the head with the fact that the Fed has been monetizing out the back
door while playing tough guy
on TV (to the public).
It is not lost on me that Biden administration Treasury
Secretary Yellen is the Fed
chief who preceded Powell and is probably hard wired to him. My tin foil hat thesis is that she's got
his ear, if she's not actively
coordinating with him.
Here again is NFTRH subscriber Michael Pollaro's graph
showing the sneaky monetization
of debt ongoing, as if a regulator or pressure release to its hawkish Fed Funds policy as consumed by
the public.

As
a side note, to say I am proud of and even awed by the sophistication of the NFTRH subscriber base would
be an understatement. This
man has been doing this kind of work longer and much more astutely than I.
So
we have established that the
Fed has been hawkish, but not really. Now let's also consider that the massively contentious, rancorous
and frankly, scary election
year of 2024 is for all the marbles. Let's consider that the Biden administration has got the
Semiconductor CHIPS Act in its hip
pocket as well as whatever new 'Green' and/or 'infrastructure' initiatives it may activate to
temporarily stimulate the
economy.
In my view they will hold some cards close to the vest until a
strategic moment this election year
and then let 'er rip. The Trump candidacy could be incinerated in one fell swoop if the economy gets
goosed at the right
time.
The above represents both Monetary (Fed) and Fiscal (government) policy
potentials and is a reason I
have had to revise my original view for the stock rally from Q1-Q2, and then Q4, 2023 to potentially
into or even through the 2024
election. "Potentially", mind you. With the risk levels (by so many indicators beyond the scope of this
article, but illustrated
frequently over the last several months) currently in play, a condition (although not a timer) for a top
is already in
place.
Circling back to gold stocks, the miners' product is doing just fine, up
there in blue sky as well.
Although gold's blue sky is nothing like the bubble beneficiaries like the major stock indexes. But if,
like me, you think the stock
market is a dead man walking, it will only be a matter of time before the macro fully aligns for gold
stocks and the massive
pro-stocks herd, which would never consider a filthy investment like gold stocks, ends up wrong as it
always does sooner or
later.
It's been a long time since 2003. A couple decades is too long to fight
a market based on principle. I
believe strongly in giving my best effort to illustrate what I see, not what I want to see.
What I see now is
a big macro shift in progress. Not complete, but methodically progressing.
Patience.











Email
us